Estimated reading time: 5 minutes
Introduction
In this article, we will analyze and compare the best nocode backends available on the market to help you choose the most suitable option for your project. We will take into account several factors, such as features, pricing, community and market evolution. After extensive research, we selected three nocode backends to analyze in detail: Firebase, Supabase, and Xano.
Table of Contents
Frontend VS Backend
Before we go any further, it is important to understand the difference between frontend and backend. The frontend is responsible for the visual part of an application, including logic, user experience (UX/UI) and database connection. The backend is responsible for the database, authentication, media storage, server actions and webhooks.
firebase
O firebase is a very famous and non-relational backend developed by Google. It offers a variety of built-in functionalities such as database, authentication, extensions, and monitoring. Firebase is widely used by large companies such as Alibaba, Duolingo and Trivago and has important security certifications. The Firebase database uses non-relational SQL, which is based on documents and collections.
Supabase
O Supabase is an alternative to Firebase, but uses relational databases. It offers services such as database, authentication, functions, media storage and real-time database. Supabase is also open source, which provides greater independence for the developer. It generates API's through SQL, making the backend more technical, but more flexible for structured projects.
Xano
O Xano it is a 100% backend in code, which means it does not require programming knowledge. It offers all the functionality of a traditional backend, such as creating APIs and databases, in a simplified and intuitive way. While it's more accessible for beginners, Xano can be less flexible and more limited in terms of advanced features.
Backend pricing
Tool prices vary depending on the use and features chosen. Firebase, for example, charges according to reading and editing the database. Supabase has a free plan and a Pro plan, with excellent value for money. The Xano has a slightly higher cost, but there are rumors that they will offer regional plans with more affordable prices for Brazil and other regions.
Main Differences between Nocode Backends
Each backend has its differences and ideal applications. Firebase is recommended for projects that require flexibility in the non-relational database and integrations with Google services. Supabase is recommended for projects with a relational database that require ease of use and cost-benefit. Finally, Xano is ideal for 100% no code projects, offering flexibility, ease of learning and independence.
Conclusion
In short, choosing the best nocode backend depends on your project needs and your skills. If you're using FlutterFlow, Firebase may be the best option due to its native integrations and FlutterFlow-specific features. If your project is on Bubble you can choose to use Xano to scale 100% in the code. Finally, if your project is being developed on the Web, it is smart to use Supabase as it is excellent for projects with relational databases and offers great cost-benefit.
Now that you know the best nocode backends on the market, which one do you find most interesting? Share your opinion in the comments! And if you have any questions, leave a comment and we will be happy to answer.
For those who want to learn how to use any of the nocode backends, we have several courses on each of these tools.
Find out more at https://nocodestartup.io/nocode-pro.
EN 
PT 
ES 